🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.