🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.