🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."